We use analytics cookies to understand how you use this site and improve our content. See our privacy policy and cookie policy for details.

Calcs.com
Global

Calcs.com expert hours with David Hourdequin (Pt. 1)

26 April 2023 · 60 min

Watch recording
David Hourdequin

David Hourdequin

President and Owner

Connor Conzelman

Connor Conzelman

Director of Customer Success


60 min

About this event

David Hourdequin of D. Rémy & Co. joins Calcs.com for a 1-hour session on designing with heavy timber for churches and chapels. The session covers heavy timber framing systems, member sizing for long spans, connection detailing, and the specific design considerations that make religious and institutional buildings challenging and rewarding for timber designers.

In this webinar we covered

  • Heavy timber framing systems: post-and-beam, timber frame, and hybrid construction
  • Member sizing for long-span beams and rafters to AWC NDS
  • Connection design: bolts, lag screws, metal connectors, and timber rivets
  • Deflection and vibration serviceability for large open-plan spaces
  • Fire resistance of heavy timber vs light-frame construction
  • Aesthetics and structural performance in exposed heavy timber design

Moment frames in place of triangulated trusses

The Saint Joseph Adoration Chapel at Belmont Abbey College is a small structure, roughly 25 feet wide and 40 feet long, built almost entirely of glass with a grid of 6-by-6 timber members on a 5-foot by 5-foot module. Because the architect wanted a square-grid appearance rather than a triangulated geometry, the frame could not rely on truss action to carry load. Instead, every connection in the grid was treated as a moment connection, and the frame was analyzed as a 2D moment frame with gravity and lateral loads applied across all relevant load combinations.

The lateral force-resisting system for the chapel could not rely on shear walls because glass filled nearly every wall bay. Diagonal tension rods in both directions, connected to steel brackets at top and bottom using swaged fittings, provided the required lateral resistance. David noted that keeping those rods snug is critical: a slack rod observed during a site visit years after construction had to be reported back to the owner for re-tensioning.

A proprietary connector called a TimberLnx was used wherever a grid member was interrupted by a crossing piece. Each connector consists of an all-thread rod with expansion sleeve-anchor pins at each end. Once installed, the pins are tightened to pre-tension the joint, creating a degree of moment resistance at every intersection. David described this as what made the structure's behavior interesting: quasi-moment connections distributed through every node of the grid.

Glulam design for an intersecting-gable church

Harrison Community Church in Cincinnati used glued laminated timber throughout, making it one of the largest glulam jobs David had undertaken. The sanctuary featured intersecting gables over the crossing, with arch members framed into steel knife plates slotted into the timber. The knife plates, either 3/8 or 1/2 inch thick, were invisible from inside the finished building but carried the primary connection loads at the king post and at each of the four arch directions radiating from it.

The intersecting gable geometry created a tension ring at the bottom chord of each truss. When vertical load is applied at the peak, every hip rafter pushes the supporting column outward. The bottom chord of each truss acts as a tie that resists that outward thrust, forming a continuous tension ring around the square perimeter. David estimated the tension in those bottom chords at roughly 70,000 pounds, carried by approximately 10 bolts across four or five shear planes.

A 30,000-pound cupola sat at the center of the intersecting gable, concentrating approximately 15 tons of vertical load at the four corner columns through the cupola's own framing. The original design called for an all-brick steeple weighing 45,000 pounds; the owner removed 15,000 pounds during design development, bringing the final load to 30,000. Distributing that load as a trapezoidal pattern across each face of the cupola framing and working it down into the four corner columns was a significant design challenge.

For designers working with curved glulam members for the first time, David flagged two items. First, the lamination layout differs between flexural and axially loaded members: flexural members should have the highest-grade laminations at the tension face, while uniaxially loaded arch members use a balanced, symmetrical layup. Second, a curved glulam member under tension tries to straighten, which puts radial tension across the glue lines between laminations. That radial tension must be checked against the limiting value using the formula in the Timber Construction Manual, sixth edition.

Cascading cupola framing at Saint Thomas the Apostle

Saint Thomas the Apostle Church in Lancaster County used a stack of three square roof forms nested under common walls at progressively smaller sizes. Each level of the stack creates its own ring of hip rafters pushing outward, and the plate at each level alternates between tension and compression depending on whether load above is pushing down into it or hanging from it.

At the tension plates, steel straps were fitted into corner housings cut into the post tops. David's approach to sizing those straps was to resolve the hip rafter forces into components parallel to each plate line and design a strap in each direction to resist the resulting tension. Quarter-inch plate steel was generally sufficient. He noted that simplicity has practical value: a contractor once pushed back on a set of drawings that specified ten different strap sizes around a single roof, and David adopted the lesson of using the worst-case strap everywhere to avoid placement errors in the field.

Contractor Josh Coleman described the assembly sequence: each cupola was assembled on the ground, the four lower hip rafters were set individually and temporarily tethered at their tails to hold position, and then the assembled cupola was lowered and nested into the waiting hip rafter tips. The peak used a reciprocal framing configuration Josh called a pinwheel, with each member nesting into the next and secured by two toe screws per joint, one angled in each direction, so that every member was tied to its neighbors on both sides.

Lateral systems and moisture management in timber frames

For the lateral system, David described 2-by-6 tongue-and-groove roof sheathing as the most common diaphragm in timber frame construction, with an allowable diaphragm capacity of about 70 pounds per foot under allowable stress design. When shear demand exceeds that limit, structural wood sheathing is overlaid on the decking to develop the required capacity. Diagonal knee braces from post to plate are used in open pavilions where no roof diaphragm is available to transfer lateral load.

The exterior wall assembly in a timber frame is typically a light-frame stud wall built outside the timber posts rather than between them. The reason is moisture-driven movement: timber posts shrink as they dry, and any joint formed between the post and an interior element will open up over time. By running the stud wall outside the post line and connecting it to each post at those locations, the shear wall load transfers into the post while the wall itself accommodates post movement. A continuous strip of oriented strand board, about 4 inches wide and as tall as the post, is set between the post face and the inside face of the stud wall as a spacer, allowing interior finishes to run behind the post without gaps opening as the post shrinks.

David closed by directing attendees to the Timber Frame Engineering Council, part of the Timber Framers Guild, as a source of example drawings, example calculations, design reports, and a professional community for engineers entering the heavy timber field.

Q&A

Those trusses at the chapel had a lot of squares and very few triangles. Are most of those members just non-structural, there to hold the glass?
David clarified that the chapel frame is not a conventional triangulated truss. Every connection is a moment connection, so the frame behaves as a moment frame rather than a true pin-jointed truss. The grid was designed that way at the architect's direction, and the inherent moments at each joint had to be explicitly accounted for in the analysis.
Were the moments at each joint calculated individually, or did you use a rule of thumb?
David used a 2D finite element frame analysis, applying gravity and wind loads across all load combinations and taking the worst-case stresses. He noted he almost always works with 2D frames to keep the analysis simple and conservative, which he considers appropriate for small structures like this chapel.
Is there anything a first-time designer should know before specifying a curved glulam member?
David highlighted two issues. First, the lamination layout matters: flexural members should have the best fibers at the tension face, while axially loaded members use a balanced, symmetrical lamination. Second, curved glulam members under bending tension try to straighten out, which puts radial tension on the glue lines between laminations. That radial tension must be checked against the limiting value using the formula in the Timber Construction Manual.
What lateral system do you typically use in a heavy timber frame, and how do you connect it to the posts?
David described using 2-by-6 tongue-and-groove sheathing as the primary diaphragm, which provides about 70 pounds per foot in allowable stress design. When shear demands exceed that limit, structural wood sheathing is overlaid on top. The exterior stud wall passes outside the timber frame rather than between posts, because the posts will shrink over time and interior joints would otherwise open up. The stud wall is connected to each post to transfer shear, with a continuous oriented strand board spacer strip running the full height of the post to allow for post movement without exposing gaps.
At the pinwheel joint at the peak of Saint Thomas, was any kind of mechanical connection used or are the members purely bearing on each other?
Josh Coleman, the contractor, explained that the members nest into each other and are toe-screwed in place once aligned. Each member gets two toe screws, one going down to the right and one going down to the left, so every joining timber is screwed to the members on either side of it in both directions.
How do you design the tension strap at the base of a cascading cupola stack, where the rafters are pushing the corner outward?
David divided the hip loads into horizontal components acting parallel to each plate line, then sized a steel strap in each direction to resist that tension at the corner. He noted that quarter-inch plate steel is typically sufficient, and the strap housing is cut into the corner of the post so that the rafter thrust transfers directly into the post.

Speakers

David Hourdequin, President and Owner at D. Rémy & Co.

David Hourdequin

President and Owner · D. Rémy & Co.

For more than six decades, David has served in nearly every capacity in construction and private practice. He earned a BCE from the University of Florida in 1964 and holds a Masters from MIT. He has spent the past 25 years specializing in heavy timber engineering - his life-long passion and joy - and serving others in the timber frame community.

Connor Conzelman, Director of Customer Success at Calcs.com

Connor Conzelman

Director of Customer Success · Calcs.com

Connor is an experienced Mechanical Engineer who found his passion in connecting his people and technical skills to help engineers in every step of their design process. Before joining Calcs.com, Connor worked as a Mechanical Design Engineer focusing on energy-efficient designs at Elara Engineering in Chicago and completed his MBA from Western Illinois University.

Standards referenced

AWC NDS 2018

Make decisions you can defend at review time

Share a calculation with the basis of design attached - inputs, formulas, and code references alongside the result.